ORWELL, LOWRY, & THE NEW RELEASE?
As some specifics in the impending ‘health care reform’ legislation are leaked to the public, I would encourage the youth of America to pick up a book I read some years back entitled “The Giver” by Lois Lowry. Millions of Americans are slowly taking note of the changes in the value of life as a result of learning some of these details.
When it came to light that Obama believed the elderly were less worthy of medical treatment ‘investments’ than younger generations, a particular aspect of “The Giver” immediately came to mind…what is to be called the Release. When I read the book I remember thinking, “Who gives someone else the ability to determine when it’s ‘okay’ to end your life?”
I surmise my answer would now be…the Obama Administration.
Over the last week or so, I’ve heard of multiple parallels being drawn between Orwell’s “1984” & the new system that is being imposed upon America; for those not familiar with “The Giver” & its carefully designed Utopia, here is a quick summary of the society which is the book’s basis…
In the Community, the “world” is perfect. Every aspect of life is controlled. There exist no choices. Every person has a pre-determined Role in the Community—all competition between citizens has been eliminated in favor of a Community where all are working solely for the “common good.”
The family “unit” is constructed carefully—1 boy & 1 girl—an application must be filled out & approved by the Selection Committee & personalities must be complimentary to one another.
However, the docility of the Community is nothing more than a thick smoke-screen for the evils that go on—namely, the Release.
The Release is practiced on the ‘un-conforming’ young (i.e. a baby who cries during the night); the elderly who, by the Committee, are determined to have lived a “full life”; & anyone else who threatens the Community’s stability…
Flowery tides of carefully designed euphemisms distance the Community from the realities of Release.
The Giver’s Community is the epitome of “safety” & is free of both poverty & war. So what could possibly be the ‘down-side’ to this place? There exists but only one person with a memory of the past—he is the Giver.
Are the Orwellian-style controls & the promises of “the greater good” really worth losing America’s foundations?
‘AFFORDABLE HEALTH CHOICES ACT OF 2009’
The proposed legislation is supposed to have been specifically designed to cover the masses of uninsured individuals & make health care in general more affordable for everyone. That entire concept as it is currently structured, defies all logic.
(And on a side note, the fact that I can’t even say “uninsured American citizens” makes me angry!)
This Ted Kennedy-esque health care is not free & it is not by any stretch of the imagination “universal.” It really is just a different series of stepping stones towards another bankrupt Ponzi scheme like the Medicare we all know & love. Subsidized health care means specifically that one group of Americans/Illegal Immigrants will receive health care at no direct cost to them, but at the expense of other Americans’ contributions.
Democrats are correct when they say the current system needs reform, but the reasons they give are not accurate portrayals of the problem & frankly, the HEALTH CARE SYSTEM itself in America is the best in the world. It is the health care INSURANCE industry that is in need of reform & ‘reform’ is not synonymous with ‘overhaul’ or ‘take-over.’ The definition of “insurance” has been lost somehow within the last 50 years & this is further addressed by Ann Coulter’s article later in this piece…
The proposed legislation begins & ends with false promises.
The creation of a new centralized-power government insurance plan intended to heighten competition in the marketplace is presented in a way which would lead one to believe that they will be permitted to keep their current employer-provided health care. Reality dictates that this proposal essentially provides small-business with incentives to drop the coverage they now offer their employees at current astronomical costs & pay the fine…thus everyone is “free to join the public option.”
This means that the “competition” the government plans are said to provide in the marketplace are rendered entirely fictional. How could these private plans possibly compete with a government plan in the first place? The government, at their discretion, can further subsidize the ‘public option.’
According to the Lewin group, an estimated 100 million Americans will be forced out of their private insurance plans as a result of this ‘sweeping reform.’ The plan also lays out a clear path for 11 million additional individuals to be enrolled into the already insufficient Medicaid program from low income, minority brackets.
Also, there are to be fines imposed on individuals who elect not to purchase health insurance because they a) don’t feel the need or b) can pay for their medical costs out-of-pocket. The argument for this is “What if you ended up in the E.R. & could not pay? You would then become everyone else’s problem & responsibility…” Well, pardon me but is that not exactly what we do for illegal immigrants currently?
Obama has also said that “…health care decisions will not be made by the government” & in the next breath describes the new Federal Health Board that will tell doctors which treatments can be had by which people.
He has attempted to tell the American people that health care spending will be cut with the implementation of this bill; the reality is that he will do this through reducing physician incomes & turning away “bad investments”—the elderly.
UNALIENABLE RIGHTS AT WAR WITH MISTAKEN ‘RIGHTS’
I find “Liberalism” in general to be a huge contradiction in & of itself—the value of life is one of the largest hypocritical positions this ideology promotes.
For example, how is it that self-described ‘bleeding heart’ Liberals are fine with an elderly individual who has lived a generally peaceful, productive, & loving life being told that he/she is no longer worth the “government’s investment” & then is “lovingly given” the attention of a government-appointed shrink who attends to their “End of Life” counseling to help ease their impending death?
Some are even supportive of infanticide up until the time when the toddler can audibly discern one day from the next…
And yet, these very same ‘bleeding heart’ Liberals staunchly oppose the death penalty for murderers, rapists, & other violent individuals who have been convicted in a court of law? These very same people who are fine with what amounts to the slaughter of millions of children in the womb each year in this country…
The arguments for Universal coverage surround the belief that health care insurance is a “right.” The individuals who promote this have lost sight of the truth…
If we were to take that belief at face value, then explain to me how it is that a governmental body can take current health coverage away from individuals because it doesn’t meet their [government’s] qualifications? What gives the government the authority to determine what coverage is sufficient for an individual & what is not? Certainly not the Constitution.
Any other answer? Precisely.
The only way that health care could possibly be a ‘right,’ is if no man has the power or authority to take it away.
People that believe health insurance is a right would do well to remember that with every personal “right” comes personal responsibility.
Lack thereof seems to be the overall theme found within the “crises” our country has faced & Obama has “fixed” since his election. Even though it is constantly written off as inaccurate, personal responsibility & accountability for one’s actions—that is exactly where the “uninsured” group lacks direction & the evidence clearly supports that statement.
THE UNINSURED—VOLUNTARY OR INVOLUNTARY?
If we are to break down the “problem,” we should start by looking at who makes up the uninsured group.
According to a study by 2 economists of the Employment Policy Institute, 43% of the “47 million” uninsured can afford to purchase health insurance, but choose not to. And in 2007, the US Census data showed that 20% of uninsured households in America earn at least $75,000 per year.
So now we are left with who (by the authors) have been deemed the “involuntarily” uninsured—these people cannot afford health insurance, but the question still remains why it is that these people cannot afford it…Is it financially impossible or is it that after purchasing other non-necessary items (i.e. cell phones, flat screen televisions, & new cars), there is nothing left?
Let’s examine who comprises the “involuntarily” uninsured group.
Nearly 1/3 are high school drop-outs; disproportionately young; close to 1/3 are undocumented & illegal immigrants, primarily of Hispanic origin; & finally, 40% of these “involuntarily” uninsured do not work during the year
If we were to remove the undocumented immigrants from the equation entirely, we see that we are left with roughly 1/3 of 47 million—is it not obvious that ‘47 million’ is a grossly overstated figure? Would this, also, not be an incentive to become documented?
Proponents of this sweeping legislation continually “forget” to mention that programs already exist to help these individuals…Medicaid & Emergency Room visits that are essentially “complimentary.” Again, these already existing programs should be the ones reformed.
PROPAGANDA & THE ACCESSIBILITY DECEPTION
Furthermore, another piece within the misconceptions commonly propagated by the MSM & the new Statist Administration is accessibility— an independent study found lack of health insurance does not mean one has no access to health care. This same study then examined if the mortality rates of the “involuntarily” uninsured were drastically different from the voluntarily uninsured or the insured themselves—there was relatively no difference.
In her most recent article, “Take Two Aspirin & Call Me When Your Cancer is Stage 4,” Ann Coulter sums up not only the purpose of insurance, but also the mindset of “entitlements” perfectly…
“The whole idea of insurance is to insure against catastrophes: You buy insurance in case your house burns down — not so you can force other people in your plan to pay for your maid. You buy car insurance in case you’re in a major accident, not so everyone in the plan shares the cost of gas.
Just as people use vastly different amounts of gasoline, they also use vastly different amounts of medical care — especially when an appointment with a highly trained physician costs less than a manicure.
Insurance plans that force everyone in the plan to pay for everyone else’s Viagra and anti-anxiety pills are already completely unfair to people who rarely go to the doctor. It’s like being forced to share gas bills with a long-haul trucker or a restaurant bill with Michael Moore. On the other hand, it’s a great deal for any lonely hypochondriacs in the plan.”
MANDATORY PREVENTIVE MEDICINE & PERSONAL CHOICES
Another aspect of the proposal that must be addressed is the dictation that Americans & other individuals will undergo when the “selection committee reviews” if their previous health behaviors warrant treatment.
If these law makers would like to journey down this road, let’s see who comprises the current groups that struggle with a variety of illnesses & other health issues that can be directly linked to their own behaviors…
By recent estimates, of the roughly $2.5 trillion annual U.S. health care bill, nearly 10% of the expense can be directly contributed to poor personal choices. Therefore, somewhere around $240 billion of this spending relates to:
Obesity & Sedentary lifestyles, Substance abuse, HIV/AIDS- ½ of this spending is from Medicaid, Other sexually transmitted diseases…
These lifestyle results occur disproportionately in low-income (& often minority) communities—the same groups that receive a good majority of their health care for “free.”
When, in an unbiased manner, one carefully examines what the root cause of the health care coverage issues are today, it’s found that lack of personal responsibility is forefront & that those who do not personally endure their own health care costs are far more likely to behave in ways in which they are more susceptible to illnesses & health problems.
WHAT THE FUTURE MAY HOLD
Obama’s health care proposals from both the House & Senate are set up to get as many people (Americans or otherwise) on the government “option” as possible. That is no “option.”
This attempt at putting more people on welfare will have the same results as other government “intervention experiments”: government dependence will increase dramatically & being “poor & disadvantaged” will be seen as beneficial to both majorities & minorities alike.
It seems this Statist government wants nothing more than to pursue their own ideals. They have bestowed upon themselves God-like powers with the ability to dictate who lives & who dies—they do this under the guise of promoting the “greater good.” They seem to feel not only “morally obligated” to make decisions for the rest of America’s citizens (because they see us as inferior to them), but they also believe they are entitled to make these decisions without ever having to live the repercussions of the legislation.
Attn: Legislators-
If your “reform” is not good enough for you to also participate in, if you would not place your children in this system by choice, then get off the backs of the American people.
Life is devalued as a result of this so-called Universal Coverage plan; an actual “right” is denied at the government’s discretion & yet so few people seem to be questioning this reality.
Life was meant to be protected. It is not something that is to be dealt & re-shuffled when the “superiors” deem necessary or in this case, cost effective.
I agree with Dick Morris in his most recent article “Rhetoric vs. Reality: Health Care by Orwell” where he states that…
“President Obama’s rhetoric last night summoned the memory of “1984,” George Orwell’s novel of a nightmarish future — where the slogan of the rulers is “War is peace; freedom is slavery; ignorance is strength.” [& then concludes with] Orwell’s heirs should sue for violation of copyright.”
The blighted future that exists in nations whose citizens view themselves as mere victims is astounding, but the nations with possibilities of prosperity for all begin with a free & responsible people.
Wake up, America.